Eco-Anxiety and the Path to Eco-Action: Finding Empowerment in a Climate-Conscious World

In an era marked by increasingly visible climate change impacts, many individuals find themselves experiencing what experts now recognize as “eco-anxiety” – a chronic fear of environmental doom. Yet, this emotional response can serve as a catalyst for positive change, especially when channeled through meaningful action and community engagement. This article explores the phenomenon of eco-anxiety and charts a course toward eco-empowerment through various pathways, including wellness practices and environmental retreats.

Understanding Eco-Anxiety: A Modern Psychological Response

Eco-anxiety refers to persistent worry about environmental degradation and climate change. The American Psychological Association formally recognized this phenomenon in a 2017 report, defining it as “a chronic fear of environmental doom” (Clayton et al., 2017). Research published in The Lancet Planetary Health found that climate anxiety affects young people particularly strongly, with 59% of surveyed youth reporting feeling “very worried” or “extremely worried” about climate change (Hickman et al., 2021).

This anxiety isn’t irrational – it’s a reasonable response to a genuine threat. As Dr. Susan Clayton, a conservation psychologist at the College of Wooster, notes: “We can think of eco-anxiety as a normal, even healthy response to the ecological threats we are facing” (Clayton, 2020).

From Anxiety to Action: The Psychological Benefits of Engagement

Psychologists have identified that transforming anxiety into purposeful action can significantly reduce feelings of helplessness. A study in the Journal of Environmental Psychology found that engagement in pro-environmental behaviors correlates with improved psychological well-being and reduced anxiety symptoms (Schmitt et al., 2018).

Dr. Renée Lertzman, a psychologist specializing in environmental engagement, argues that acknowledging our emotional responses to climate change is essential before meaningful action can occur. “When we create spaces where people can process their feelings about environmental challenges, they become more capable of creative, sustained engagement” (Lertzman, 2019).

Environmental Detox: Reducing External and Internal Pollution

The concept of environmental detox operates on two levels: reducing our exposure to environmental toxins and cleansing ourselves of the psychological burden of climate distress.

Research published in Environmental Health Perspectives demonstrates how even brief exposures to natural environments can reduce physiological stress markers (Bratman et al., 2019). This finding supports the growing practice of “forest bathing” or shinrin-yoku, a Japanese concept involving immersion in nature to improve mental and physical health (Hansen et al., 2017).

Simultaneously, reducing our ecological footprint through conscious consumption choices can provide a sense of agency. A study in Sustainable Production and Consumption found that participants who adopted sustainable lifestyle practices reported higher levels of life satisfaction and purpose (Kasser, 2017).

Community Engagement: Finding Strength in Collective Action

Individual actions matter, but research consistently demonstrates that collective engagement amplifies both environmental impact and psychological benefits. A study from Yale University found that community-based environmental initiatives generated stronger and more lasting positive outcomes than isolated individual actions (Bamberg & Möser, 2017).

Social connection not only enhances our collective capacity for change but also provides emotional support. As noted in Nature Climate Change, “Social networks that include climate conversations can help process difficult emotions while building resilience and adaptive capacity” (Ojala, 2016).

Empowerment Retreats: Structured Spaces for Transformation

Environmental and wellness retreats offer structured environments where participants can process eco-anxiety while developing practical skills for sustainable living. A study in the Journal of Environmental Education found that immersive environmental education experiences led to increased environmental advocacy and sustained behavioral changes (Monroe et al., 2019).

These retreats typically incorporate several evidence-based elements:

1. Mindfulness practices: Research published in Mindfulness demonstrates that regular mindfulness practice can reduce anxiety and increase cognitive flexibility when facing environmental challenges (Wamsler, 2018).
2. Skills development: Learning practical sustainability skills creates self-efficacy. A meta-analysis in Environment and Behavior found that skill-building workshops led to higher rates of sustained environmental behavior change than information-only interventions (Stern, 2020).
3. Nature connection: Direct experiences in nature correlate with stronger environmental values and commitments. Research in Environmental Education Research found that time spent in natural settings was the strongest predictor of long-term environmental advocacy (Otto & Pensini, 2017).

Digital Detox: Recalibrating Our Relationship with Information

The constant stream of climate disaster news can overwhelm our capacity to respond effectively. The American Psychological Association notes that excessive media consumption about climate disasters contributes significantly to eco-anxiety (Clayton et al., 2017).

Environmental wellness retreats often include digital detox components, which research in the Journal of Environmental Psychology suggests can improve mental health outcomes while maintaining environmental commitment (Fenton & Hopsch, 2020). Rather than disconnecting from environmental concerns, these practices help participants develop healthier information consumption habits.

Practical Paths Forward: Daily Rituals for Eco-Empowerment

Integrating climate consciousness into daily routines creates sustainable engagement patterns. Research from the University of California found that ritualized pro-environmental behaviors were more likely to be maintained long-term than those adopted as isolated decisions (Wood & Neal, 2016).

Effective practices supported by research include:

• Gratitude practices: Expressing gratitude for natural resources increases conservation motivation (Tam, 2019).
• Structured climate action: Setting specific, achievable environmental goals reduces feeling overwhelmed (Gifford & Chen, 2017).
• Mindful consumption: Conscious purchasing decisions increase perceived agency (Geiger et al., 2018).

A Balanced Approach to Eco-Anxiety and Climate Engagement

The path from eco-anxiety to eco-empowerment isn’t about dismissing legitimate concerns but rather about engaging with them productively. Dr. Susie Burke, an environmental psychologist with the Australian Psychological Society, emphasizes: “The goal isn’t to eliminate concern about climate change but to transform paralysis into productive action” (Burke et al., 2018).

By combining psychological well-being practices with tangible environmental actions, individuals can contribute meaningfully to ecological solutions while maintaining their mental health. Environmental wellness retreats and community initiatives provide structured opportunities to develop these balanced approaches.

As we navigate an increasingly climate-conscious world, remember that anxiety can be a doorway to deeper engagement rather than a barrier. Through mindful action, community connection, and strategic self-care, we can transform ecological concern into empowered environmental stewardship.

Explore the energetic spaces,  facilities and grounds on offer at Gymea here
Check the current availability availability on our retreat calendar: here

---

References

Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2017). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25.

Bratman, G. N., Anderson, C. B., Berman, M. G., Cochran, B., De Vries, S., Flanders, J., Folke, C., Frumkin, H., Gross, J. J., Hartig, T., & Kahn, P. H. (2019). Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective. Science Advances, 5(7), eaax0903.

Burke, S., Waite, T. D., & Doherty, T. J. (2018). Climate change and mental health. American Journal of Public Health, 108(S2), S138-S139.

Clayton, S. (2020). Climate anxiety: Psychological responses to climate change. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 74, 102263.

Clayton, S., Manning, C. M., Krygsman, K., & Speiser, M. (2017). Mental health and our changing climate: Impacts, implications, and guidance. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association and ecoAmerica.

Fenton, A., & Hopsch, L. (2020). Digital detox and environmental awareness: Nature-based interventions for addressing climate anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101525.

Geiger, S. M., Fischer, D., & Schrader, U. (2018). Measuring what matters in sustainable consumption: An integrative framework for the selection of relevant behaviors. Sustainable Development, 26(1), 18-33.

Gifford, R., & Chen, A. (2017). Why aren’t we taking action? Psychological barriers to climate-positive food choices. Climatic Change, 140(2), 165-178.

Hansen, M. M., Jones, R., & Tocchini, K. (2017). Shinrin-yoku (forest bathing) and nature therapy: A state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(8), 851.

Hickman, C., Marks, E., Pihkala, P., Clayton, S., Lewandowski, R. E., Mayall, E. E., Wray, B., Mellor, C., & van Susteren, L. (2021). Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: A global survey. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(12), e863-e873.

Kasser, T. (2017). Living both well and sustainably: A review of the literature with some reflections on future research, interventions and policy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2095), 20160369.

Lertzman, R. (2019). Environmental melancholia: Psychoanalytic dimensions of engagement. Routledge.

Monroe, M. C., Plate, R. R., Oxarart, A., Bowers, A., & Chaves, W. A. (2019). Identifying effective climate change education strategies: A systematic review of the research. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 791-812.

Ojala, M. (2016). Facing anxiety in climate change education: From therapeutic practice to hopeful transgressive learning. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 41-56.

Otto, S., & Pensini, P. (2017). Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 47, 88-94.

Schmitt, M. T., Aknin, L. B., Axsen, J., & Shwom, R. L. (2018). Unpacking the relationships between pro-environmental behavior, life satisfaction, and perceived ecological threat. Ecological Economics, 143, 130-140.

Stern, P. C. (2020). A reexamination on how behavioral interventions can promote household action to limit climate change. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1-7.

Tam, K. P. (2019). Gratitude facilitates environmental commitment through positive emotions and perceived efficacy. Environment and Behavior, 51(7), 856-871.

Wamsler, C. (2018). Mind the gap: The role of mindfulness in adapting to increasing risk and climate change. Sustainability Science, 13(4), 1121-1135.

Wood, W., & Neal, D. T. (2016). Healthy through habit: Interventions for initiating & maintaining health behavior change. Behavioral Science & Policy, 2(1), 71-83.