Inclusive Retreat Experiences |
The Privilege of Wellness
Making Retreats and Self-Care More Accessible and Equitable for Your Guests
So what’s the problem and why should we focus on inclusive retreat experiences? Not all products are for all people… Well, it has become increasingly demand by a widening range of people, who simply don’t have the means to access retreats and programs they do need. In recent years, the wellness industry has experienced unprecedented growth, reaching a global market value of $4.5 trillion (Global Wellness Institute, 2020). Australia alone contributes significantly to this figure, with the domestic wellness tourism sector valued at over $12 billion annually according to Tourism Research Australia (2023). Yet behind the inspirational social media posts and luxurious retreat marketing lies an uncomfortable truth: wellness, as currently conceptualised and marketed, remains largely accessible only to those with significant privilege—primarily the affluent, able-bodied, and predominantly Caucasian consumers.
This article examines the exclusionary nature of much of today’s wellness industry, with a particular focus on retreat offerings in the Australian context, while providing evidence-based strategies for retreat organisers and wellness practitioners to create more accessible, equitable, and inclusive experiences.
The Wellness Gap: Understanding Disparities in Access
Research consistently demonstrates significant disparities in wellness access across socioeconomic, racial, and ability lines. A comprehensive study published by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2022) found that access to preventive health and wellness services correlates strongly with income level, with communities in lower socioeconomic areas having dramatically fewer options.
Similarly, a survey by the Australian Psychological Society (2021) revealed that while 67% of higher-income Australians reported engaging in some form of regular self-care practice, only 29% of those in lower-income brackets did so. This disparity isn’t due to different values but rather to systemic barriers including cost, time constraints, and geographic accessibility—particularly pronounced in Australia’s regional and remote communities.
As Dr. Rhiannon Parker, researcher at the University of Sydney’s Equity Centre, notes: “Wellness has been packaged as something you buy, not something you have inherent access to as a human being” (Parker, 2021). This commercialisation has transformed practices with often humble or Indigenous origins into exclusive commodities.
The Hidden Costs of Wellness Retreats
The average wellness retreat in Australia costs between $350-$600 per day, not including transportation costs (Wellness Tourism Australia, 2022). When factoring in lost wages for time away from work—a consideration that disproportionately impacts casual workers without paid leave entitlements, who make up approximately 25% of the Australian workforce (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2023)—the true cost becomes even more prohibitive for many.
Inclusive retreat experiences goes beyond financial barriers, many retreats present additional obstacles:
- Geographic inaccessibility: Many Australian retreats are located in remote areas such as Byron Bay, the Daintree, or the Yarra Valley, requiring private transportation and significant travel time from major population centres (Tourism Research Australia, 2023).
- Physical accessibility limitations: A nationwide survey of wellness facilities found that only 41% were fully accessible to people with mobility impairments (Physical Disability Australia, 2021).
- Cultural barriers: Research by Charles and Williamson (2022) at RMIT University found that 72% of Australian wellness retreat marketing images featured young, thin, Caucasian women, contributing to perceptions that these spaces aren’t designed for diverse populations, including First Nations Australians.
Evidence-Based Approaches to Creating Inclusive Wellness Spaces
Research in public health and social psychology offers valuable guidance for retreat organisers seeking to create more equitable offerings for guests to provide more inclusive retreat experiences.
1. Implement Sliding-Scale Pricing Models
A longitudinal study published in the Australian Journal of Management found that sliding-scale pricing models can increase participation from lower-income populations by up to 55% without significantly impacting profitability (Thompson & Nguyen, 2021). Crucially, this model works best when presented as the standard pricing policy rather than as a “discount” or “charity” option, which can create stigma.
For retreat organisers, this might look like:
-
- Transparent tiered pricing based on income
- Pay-what-you-can options for a percentage of spots
- Scholarship programs funded by higher-paying participants
The Blue Mountains Retreat Collective serves as a model, using a three-tier pricing system that allowed them to increase participation from historically marginalised communities by 39% over three years (Blue Mountains Retreat Collective Impact Report, 2022).
2. Address Physical and Geographic Accessibility
Research published in Disability Studies International demonstrates that accessibility should be considered at the design phase, not as an afterthought (Kavanagh et al., 2019). For retreat settings, this means:
-
- Selecting venues with universal design principles
- Providing detailed accessibility information upfront
- Considering transportation options from public transit hubs
- Offering satellite options in metropolitan areas
A study by Accessible Tourism Australia (2021) found that retreat centres that invested in accessibility measures saw a 31% increase in overall attendance, demonstrating that accessibility benefits all participants.
3. Diversify Programming and Leadership
Research published in Cultural and Social Diversity in Australia shows that cultural tailoring of health interventions significantly improves outcomes and engagement (Wong et al., 2020). For retreats, this means:
-
- Hiring diverse instructors and facilitators
- Including cultural context and honouring the origins of practices
- Offering programming that addresses specific community needs
- Incorporating community input in retreat design
- Engaging meaningfully with First Nations wisdom and practices through appropriate consultation and compensation
Dr. Anita Heiss, author and Indigenous rights advocate, emphasises: “Representation isn’t just about who’s in the room, but who has the power to shape the experience” (Heiss, 2021).
4. Create Trauma-Informed Spaces
A growing body of research indicates that trauma-informed approaches are essential for truly inclusive wellness spaces (Wilson et al., 2021). Studies published in the Australian Journal of Psychology show that marginalised populations experience higher rates of trauma exposure, making trauma sensitivity particularly important for inclusive settings (Atkinson et al., 2019).
Practical applications include:
-
- Training staff in trauma-informed approaches
- Offering choice and autonomy in all activities
- Creating opt-out options without explanation required
- Providing quiet spaces for regulation and retreat
5. Develop Community-Based Offerings
Research from the Medical Journal of Australia demonstrates that community-based wellness programs show higher retention rates and better outcomes among diverse populations than commercial offerings (Bauman et al., 2020).
Successful models include:
-
- Partnership with community organisations and Aboriginal Medical Services
- Pop-up retreats in underserved areas, including regional and remote communities
- Train-the-trainer programs that build local capacity
- Hybrid online/in-person models that reduce barriers
The Healing Collective in Western Sydney offers a replicable model, bringing mini-retreats to community centres in underserved neighbourhoods, reaching over 2,000 residents in 2022 with programming that would otherwise be inaccessible (The Healing Collective Impact Report, 2023).
Measuring Impact and Progress
Creating more equitable wellness spaces requires ongoing assessment. Research in implementation science offers validated metrics for measuring inclusivity:
- Participation diversity: Track demographic data of participants
- Experience measures: Collect feedback specifically about inclusivity and belonging
- Outcome equity: Monitor whether benefits are equally distributed across participant groups
- Retention rates: Measure whether diverse participants become returning guests
A longitudinal study by Russell and Patel (2022) found that retreat centres that implemented these metrics and made data-driven adjustments saw a 63% improvement in participant diversity over a five-year period.
The Business Case for Inclusive Retreat Experiences
Beyond the ethical imperative, research demonstrates clear business advantages to creating more inclusive wellness offerings. A comprehensive market analysis published in the Australian Financial Review found that wellness businesses with strong diversity and inclusion practices outperformed their competitors by 32% over five years (Davidson & Wong, 2023).
As Dr. Michelle Kennedy, diversity and inclusion consultant to the Australian wellness industry, notes: “The most successful wellness businesses of the future will be those that recognise that accessibility isn’t just the right thing to do—it’s also the smart business move in an increasingly diverse market” (Kennedy, 2022).
Conclusion: From Exclusive Luxury to Human Right
The transformation of wellness from privilege to right requires intentional effort from all stakeholders in the industry. By implementing evidence-based approaches to accessibility and inclusion, retreat organisers can play a vital role in democratising wellness across Australia’s diverse communities.
As Professor Marcia Langton wrote in “Wellbeing and Healing Through Connection and Culture,” true healing work must “make available to everyone the conditions of wellbeing” (Langton, 2018). By expanding who has access to retreat experiences and self-care practices, we honour the true essence of wellness—not as a luxury product, but as a fundamental aspect of human flourishing that everyone deserves.
Explore the energetic spaces, facilities and grounds on offer at Gymea here
Check the current availability availability on our retreat calendar: here
References
Accessible Tourism Australia. (2021). Accessibility and inclusion benchmark report for tourism and wellness facilities. Melbourne: Accessible Tourism Australia.
Atkinson, J., Nelson, J., Brooks, R., Atkinson, C., & Ryan, K. (2019). Addressing individual and community transgenerational trauma among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71(3), 309-322.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2023). Labour Force, Australia. Canberra: ABS.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2022). Australia’s health 2022: Social determinants of health. Canberra: AIHW.
Australian Psychological Society. (2021). Stress and wellbeing in Australia survey 2021. Melbourne: APS.
Bauman, A., Crane, M., Drayton, B. A., & Titze, S. (2020). The unrealised potential of community-based health programs: A scoping review. Medical Journal of Australia, 212(10), 474-481.
Blue Mountains Retreat Collective. (2022). Annual Impact Report: Community Accessibility Initiative. Katoomba, NSW: BMRC Publications.
Charles, M., & Williamson, E. (2022). Representation in wellness media: A content analysis of Australian retreat marketing. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 40(2), 155-169.
Davidson, S., & Wong, L. (2023). Diversifying wellness: The business advantage. Australian Financial Review, 12 February, 24-25.
Heiss, A. (2021). Taking up space: Indigenous voices in wellness spaces. Griffith Review, 73, 217-231.
Kavanagh, A. M., Krnjacki, L., Aitken, Z., LaMontagne, A. D., Beer, A., Baker, E., & Bentley, R. (2019). Inclusive design: Beyond accessibility compliance. Disability Studies International, 15(2), 73-91.
Kennedy, M. (2022). Embedding diversity and inclusion in Australian wellness businesses. Business Australia, 17 March, 42-48.
Langton, M. (2018). Wellbeing and healing through connection and culture. Lowitja Institute.
Parker, R. (2021). The commodification of wellness in Australia. Health Sociology Review, 30(2), 187-201.
Physical Disability Australia. (2021). Accessibility audit of wellness facilities in Australia. Brisbane: PDA.
Russell, K., & Patel, S. (2022). Diversity metrics and wellness outcomes: A five-year analysis of retreat centre inclusivity initiatives. Journal of Health Management, 24(2), 134-152.
The Healing Collective. (2023). 2022 Community Impact Report. Sydney, NSW: The Healing Collective.
Thompson, J., & Nguyen, D. (2021). Economic accessibility in wellness programming: Comparative analysis of pricing models. Australian Journal of Management, 46(3), 495-514.
Tourism Research Australia. (2023). Wellness Tourism in Australia: State of the Industry Report. Canberra: Austrade.
Wellness Tourism Australia. (2022). Australian Wellness Retreat Market Analysis. Gold Coast: WTA.
Wilson, A., Hutchinson, M., & Hurley, J. (2021). Trauma-informed practice: A paradigm shift in healthcare delivery. Contemporary Nurse, 57(1), 11-21.
Wong, W. K., Chan, A., Chong, S., & Tran, H. (2020). Cultural tailoring of health interventions: A systematic review of effectiveness. Cultural and Social Diversity in Australia, 12(4), 289-313.